Press one of the expand buttons to see the full text of an article. Later press collapse to revert to the original form. The buttons below expand or collapse all articles.



Aggrieved Father Ignored

December 23, 2013 permalink

British Columbia father Frederick Philip Shupe threatened his social worker by leaving a message on her voicemail stating “he will haunt her until she dies.” In the news article there was nothing about what drove the father to such desperation. A letter from a reader questioned why newspapers print the views of social services and ministers, but never interview parents to get their side.



Social workers fear client in custody dispute, court hears

A North Shore social services office is in “lockdown” over fears of a father embroiled in a child-custody battle.

A Crown prosecutor Tuesday outlined measures taken by Secwepemc Child & Family Services to protect staff from Frederick Philip Shupe.

“All of them are expressing a real fear of Mr. Shupe,” said Crown lawyer Neil Flanagan. “I’ve been told the Sydney Avenue office is now in lockdown . . . . Workers are afraid of him.”

Shupe, 45, was convicted after trial on two counts of uttering threats. In the first instance he left a message on a social worker’s voicemail stating “he will haunt her until she dies,” Flanagan said.

In the second instance, he confided to a probation officer that he wanted to tie up social workers, hold them hostage and set traps for police when they come to free them.

Shupe is awaiting sentencing on the convictions. As part of his bail conditions, the Crown sought to keep him away from social workers, making his only contact through a lawyer.

His lawyer, Don Campbell, said Shupe doesn’t want contact with Secwepemc Child & Family Services and would like the file transferred to another First Nations social agency in the city.

“He’s forced to go there because his children are in their care. Secwepemc Child & Family Services holds the key to any contact with his children.”

Shupe is involved in a separate family court proceeding regarding contact with his children.

Campbell said the agency “doesn’t want anything to do with him but they cling tenaciously to his file.”

Judge Edmond de Walle ruled that as part of bail conditions that Shupe have no direct or indirect contact with staff or family from the agency and he is banned from being within 100 metres of its offices.

He will be sentenced on the charges of uttering threats at a later date.

Source: Kamloops Daily News

Why wasn’t parent interviewed?

I am writing in response to your Dec. 11 article, Social Workers Fear Client. It seems to me that this article is one-sided. The parent was not interviewed so he could relate his side of the story.

So often in news articles about the Ministry for Children and Families, B.C. Child and Youth representative Mary-Ellen Turpel-Lafond is interviewed with criticism against the ministry and then Minister Stephanie Cadieux or deputy minister Mark Sieben is interviewed for a rebuttal.

Why are the parents not given the same time and coverage as the agencies? Why are the parents not listened to and their evidence considered? What about the fear that the parents have against a ministry that has taken their children, while uttering threats to the parents?

I always thought that the media operated under the guise of freedom of speech. But it would seem to me that the parents do not have the same freedom or coverage.



Editor’s note: The story you refer to was a court story about threats by an individual to ministry staff, threats that were serious enough police investigated and recommended charges, which Crown approved and the case proceeded to trial. It was not about the man’s child-custody battle.

Source: Kamloops Daily News